Instrument Student's Log Checkride, Part Two
Flight 50
Home > Flight Training >
Instrument Training Logs > Part 22
Flight 50: Wed, June 18: Checkride, Part Two. (1.2 / 5.6 / 79.7)
I passed the oral part of the test last time, so I didn't have to do any
studying to prepare for today. There was a small amount of paperwork to do,
and then we went flying.
The first part of the flight went very well; I did an ILS and
an NDB approach, both of which were fine. Next I was supposed to fly the
published missed approach, which included a holding pattern.
About halfway out
to the holding fix, the controller told me to hold on a different side of the intersection than
the chart shows, due to skydiving activity. Now I had my first real chance to screw
up the test.
It had been a month or so since I had done any holding, and a lot longer
since I was given nonstandard holding instructions to figure out in flight. I sketched
the new pattern and tried to pick the right entry method before reaching the fix.
When I got to the fix I made a turn that put me on the wrong side of the intersection,
but eventually I got straightened out and hoped I was still passing the test. (It's
always a good idea to assume you're passing until told otherwise.)
After the holding we cancelled IFR (but kept flight following), and I was asked to
do some unusual attitude recoveries and steep turns. We got several reports of
traffic, and the examiner responded to those directly. Then he requested a VOR
approach, and I thought I was supposed to do the whole thing. I got some vectors
that I thought were to maneuver around traffic, and was waiting for a clearance to
head to the VOR and do the approach but never heard one.
The examiner wondered why I hadn't
descended, since we wound up directly over the airport at 2000 feet. (I was being
given headings, so I kept flying them.) When he realized what the confusion was,
he let me try it again, and it went fine.
For some reason I thought we were
supposed to do the full approach for the test, but after reading the test standards
again, I couldn't find that requirement. After all those flights trying to fly out on a
radial, make a procedure turn, etc., all I had to do for the test was fly toward the
VOR, descend, and level off close to the minimum. The approach ended with a
circle-to-land maneuver and a touch & go, then we went back home.
I flew back without the hood, assuming I had passed the test, and hoping not
to make some major blunder on the way. The IFR test can only be failed by
failing one of the IFR tasks, but I didn't want to embarrass myself (any more than
I already had) with a bad landing or the like.
We got back on the ground, and he
told me I had passed. I felt more relief than anything else- relief that I don't have
to schedule any more lessons or do the same approaches repeatedly, that it's
finally over after eight months and 60 or 70 hours of instruction, that I didn't give
up after almost doing so several times, and that I don't
have to do any more flight tests in the summer heat.
Now I can cut back on flying and then work on
other things later. The only bad thing is having to give up my first license.
It had to be sent to the FAA with the application, and a new one was mailed to
me. It's nice to have one that has the instrument rating on it, but it's too bad
I can't keep the original one for the sentimental value.
Thanks for all the help, Jack.
Copyright ©1996-2004. All rights reserved. (2/12/04)
|